(Inter-) National Linguistic Associations endorsing the

Guidelines for the Use of Language Analysis in Relation

to Questions of National Origin in Refugee Cases

 

 

The Guidelines… (2004) are a document prepared jointly by members of the Language and National Origin Group in 2004, and subsequently published in The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law: Forensic Linguistics, Vol. 11 no. 2, pp. 179-266. They were intended for the guidance of both language professionals and concerned government agencies and NGOs, including both:

·                    Linguists who have not yet been involved in such situations, but might become so, or who feel they ought to be informed about developments in their field; and

·                    Non-linguists (e.g. lawyers, administrative judges, asylum issues activists, members of government agencies involved in making asylum decisions, and others) who recognise that issues of language and nationality are complex, and who recognize the importance of contributions by qualified experts in this area.

The Guidelines… are intended merely as a starting point in a new, urgent and rapidly-developing field of linguistic practice. The document provides the necessary context, and recommends a set of principles that the signers think most linguists will find uncontroversial, even obvious. It does however touch on a number of bases that might not immediately occur to colleagues contacted about this matter for the first time.

The document is also addressed to people outside our profession, giving an idea of what we think the minimum requirements and safeguards for competent professional language analysis ought to be. This is perhaps its most important function: to serve as a touchstone and reference point for governments seeking to know how to conduct their investigations in a professional manner; for asylum applicants who have been turned down, in part because of what they believe to be incorrect assessments based in part on language; and for advocates who need information about the connections between language and national origins.

The Guidelines… have been cited as influential not only by academic linguists, but also by commercial companies involved in the assessment of refugees’ speech, by legal representatives of refugees in court proceedings and immigration tribunals, and by government bureaux assigned to evaluate asylum applications.

A copy of the Guidelines… may be accessed here: http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~patrickp/language-origin-refugees.pdf,

as well as here: http://www.iafl.org/, on the webpage of the International Association of Forensic Linguists (go to “Activity”, then “Documents”). In fact, many endorsing organizations sponsor such links (see below).

 

To date (11 January 2009), the Guidelines… have received the following endorsements from national and international associations of linguistic scholars and practitioners:

 

AAAL – American Association for Applied Linguistics

§        http://www.aaal.org/  (‘Resolutions’ links to the Guidelines)

§        AAAL endorsed the Guidelines at their business meeting on 19 June 2006

 

AIDA – Association Internationale de Dialectologie Arabe

§             http://www.aida.or.at/

§             AIDA endorsed the Guidelines in their General Assembly on 9 Sept 2006

 

ALAA – Applied Linguistics Association of Australia

§             http://www.alaa.org.au/     (‘Policy Initiatives’ links to the Guidelines)

§             The ALAA endorsed the Guidelines in 2005 among their Policy Initiatives.

 

ALS – Australian Linguistic Society

§             http://www.als.asn.au/    (‘Policies’ links to the Guidelines)

§             The ALS adopted a motion endorsing the Guidelines without objection at their annual general meeting of Sept 2005.

 

ANELA – De Nederlandse Vereniging voor Toegepaste Taalwetenschaap (Association of Applied Linguistics)

§             http://www.anela.nl/

§             ANELA endorsed the Guidelines in 2007.

 

AVT – Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschaap (Society for General Linguistics)

§             http://www.hum.leiden.edu/lucl/avt  

§             AVT endorsed the Guidelines in 2006.

 

BAAL – British Association for Applied Linguistics

§             http://www.baal.org.uk/    (‘Academic Materials’ > ‘Recommendations on good practice’ links to the Guidelines)

§             The Executive Committee endorsed the Guidelines in 2005.

 

IAFL – International Association of Forensic Linguists

§             http://www.iafl.org/     (‘Activity’ > ‘Documents’ links to the Guidelines)

§             The International Association of Forensic Linguists unanimously passed a motion on 12 July 2003  at its biennial conference in Sydney, which read in part: “Delegates… unanimously reject this so-called ‘language analysis’ as unprofessional and unreliable.” [this preceded publication of the Guidelines]

 

LAGB – Linguistic Association of Great Britain

§             http://www.lagb.org.uk/    (homepage contains a link to the Guidelines)

§             A motion endorsing the Guidelines and recommending them to membership was put to the LAGB in October 2004 and adopted without reservation.

 

LSA – Linguistic Society of America

§             http://www.lsadc.org   (‘Sitemap’ > ‘Resolutions, Statements and Guides’)

§             A ‘sense-of-the-meeting’ resolution was passed at the annual  business meeting on 9 Jan 2009, with no votes against, endorsing the Guidelines & recommending them to the membership.

 

SPCL – Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics

§             http://www.mona.uwi.edu/dllp/spcl/home.html  

§             The SPCL meeting in January 2005 unanimously adopted a resolution endorsing the Guidelines and recommending them to the membership.

 

Peter L Patrick's home page

Linguistic Human Rights homepage