Educational materials © for/by Peter L. Patrick. May contain copyright material used for educational purposes. Please respect copyright.

 

Linguistic Human Rights:

A Sociolinguistic Introduction

 by Prof. Peter. L Patrick

Dept. of Language & Linguistics

University of Essex

Why?

Origins of my interest in LHR, and this webpage

o       My own research interests are focused principally on the structure and use of disrespected language varieties: Caribbean Creole languages, African Diaspora English varieties (such as US African American English, British Afro-Caribbean English), and urban vernacular dialects of English in the US and UK, with a side interest in signed languages (but no competence as a signer!). Like most sociolinguists, I believe that such speakers have the right to have their language recognized and respected, the right to determine when they should use it without prejudice or restriction by non-speakers, the right to proper attitudes and understanding of their language by educational institutions, equal access to essential social services (medical care, legal aid, voting rights etc.) and so forth. It has been a short step from these beliefs to a desire for a generalized view of language rights, which both incorporates the cultural and historical experience of unique groups, and unifies them with universally applicable needs, deserts and responsibilities. (Whether this is possible, I am not sure.)

o       In spring 2002 at the biannual Sociolinguistic Symposium, a colloquium on Linguistic Rights and Wrongs (organized by Donna Patrick & Jane Freeland) piqued my interest - especially a paper by Jan Blommaert and Stephen May, “Moving beyond ecology of language and linguistic human rights: Developing a non-essentialist defence of minority language rights”.

o       I first developed this site in 2003 as a brief primer in connection with a visit to the University of Essex by Prof Jan Blommaert, renowned linguist, Africanist and discourse analyst at Gent University, who addressed a large interdisciplinary audience. Blommaert’s stimulating argument was aimed to upset several orthodoxies. For example, he juxtaposed the common emotional reaction to the tragic disappearance of ancient indigenous languages worldwide, with the right of indigenous peoples to choose economic security for their children by educating them in dominant languages (though he pointed out these are not always in conflict). He also strongly critiqued the best-known framework and assumptions concerning LHR among linguists, and developed an alternative viewpoint. (See References, Lectures for more)

o       Subsequently in 2003 I sought dialogue and had several discussions with staff of the University of Essex Human Rights Centre, and have attended several of the weekly short talks by HRC staff, which have enlarged my still-tentative understanding of the field. I have begun to develop materials for a course (MA and final-year undergraduate level) on LHR.

o       As current organizer of the Linguistics Dept. Seminar, I have used my discretion to bring several speakers with a particular interest in this field, developing into an Annual Lecture on Language and Human Rights at Essex (details here). More information on the Linguistics Dept. Seminar, which sponsors this annual lecture, can be found here.

o       In August 2003, at a conference of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics in Honolulu, Hawai’i, I participated in discussion at a special session chaired by Prof Diana Eades, concerning language analysis of national origins for refugee/asylum cases, in which about a dozen linguists aired their experiences and apprehensions. Subsequently a closed email discussion list was initiated in autumn 2003 to pursue and broaden the discussion, with a focus on how to arrive at and promote a code of best-practice for linguists. I was one of several dozen discussants.

o       In June 2004 a set of guidelines was proposed and adopted, which is now being publicised.

o       In autumn 2004, several signatories of the Guidelines have moved resolutions endorsing them to organized bodies of linguists. For an online copy and more on this topic, see here.

o       In October 2004, I expanded and revised the original website to reflect the growth of these interests, and to serve as a resource for a potentially wider group of people.

 

Linguistic Human Rights homepage   -   Peter L Patrick homepage

Last revised 2 November 2005