|
Scientific |
||||||
|
The story behind:
“I reproduced many experiments from various branches of physics when I was 7 and 8 years old. By providing me with the book called ‘Physics for children’, I guess my parents were partially guilty for that I spent my childhood soldering electronic circuits rather than playing with dolls. Physics seemed to be easy and fun.
Later in my life, I was performing as a dancer and musician. We staged the “Red hat” story using mathematical objects such as numbers and arithmetic operations (e.g., how would you dance the equation x=(2+2)/4)?). Choreographers often borrow concepts from various sciences to create their work, for example, chaos theory, fractals, manifold, symmetry, reflection, mirroring etc. Musicians use algorithmic composition to create music. Bell ringing also won’t be possible without applying mathematical patterns.
As a researcher now, I wonder why there are two separate sections in grant application forms: ‘description of your project’ and ‘description to lay audience’. I also wonder why many scientific books and articles are written in such a complicated manner. Often just dry formulas without any (or poor) explanation what they actually mean, how they work and what is behind them.
It seems like a competition among academics: the more mathematical symbols and the more sophisticated representation, the better. If the majority don’t understand your work then it might be highly technical and intelligent. Perhaps. Or perhaps it’s just inability to explain your science to a 7-years old child? I wish I could remember now the authors of my ‘Physics for children’ book!” |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||